Been failing interviews, is it possible my current job is as good as it gets?
Our take
I’ve been interviewing for the past few months across big tech, hedge funds and startups. Out of 8 companies, I’ve only made it to one onsite and almost got the offer. The rest were rejections at the hiring manager or technical rounds, and one role got filled before I could even finish the technical interviews.
I’ve definitely been taking notes and improving each time, but data science interviews feel so different from company to company that it’s hard to prepare in a consistent way and build momentum.
It’s really getting to me now and I have started wondering if maybe I’m just not good enough to land a higher paying role, and if my current job might be my ceiling. For context, I’m targeting senior data scientist (ML) roles in a very high cost of living area.
Would appreciate hearing from others who’ve been through something similar.
[link] [comments]
Read on the original site
Open the publisher's page for the full experience
Related Articles
- What to take away from failed interviews when you don’t really know why you failed?After every interview and hiring decision, I keep notes on what went wrong, what I could improve, and why I either moved forward or got rejected. I recently finished two onsite interviews where I walked away feeling genuinely good about my performance and how I handled the conversations. For one of them, I was honestly pretty confident I would get an offer. Instead, both ended in rejection, or at least that is how I see it since one company completely ghosted me afterward. What I am struggling with now is figuring out what I am supposed to learn from experiences like this. If I prepared well, communicated well, and left feeling positive, then what exactly caused the rejection? More importantly, how do you improve when you cannot even identify what went wrong? submitted by /u/quite--average [link] [comments]
- [D] ML researcher looking to switch to a product company.Hey, I am an AI researcher currently working in a deep tech company as a data scientist. Prior to this, I was doing my PhD. My current role involves working ok physics related problems and the project life cycle could be 2-4 years and the change comes in my company very slowly. The problems are quite interesting but because of the slow pace of development, I find myself getting often frustrated. As a byproduct, I don’t think that I am learning as much as I can. Because of these reasons, I want to move to a company where the development cycles are short and you have the flexibility to iterate and test quickly. Ideally a company which directly interacts with customers, like uber. The problem I am facing is that in the interview processes, a lot of these companies require you to have a lot of practical experience with AB testing type of approaches, especially in the senior roles that I am applying for. I think I can bring a lot of the table but I just don’t have much practical experience with the product experimentation. How do I convince people to give me a shot despite that? submitted by /u/wonder2man [link] [comments]
- AI isn’t making data science interviews easier.I sit in hiring loops for data science/analytics roles, and I see a lot of discussion lately about AI “making interviews obsolete” or “making prep pointless.” From the interviewer side, that’s not what’s happening. There’s a lot of posts about how you can easily generate a SQL query or even a full analysis plan using AI, but it only means we make interviews harder and more intentional, i.e. focusing more on how you think rather than whether you can come up with the correct/perfect answers. Some concrete shifts I’ve seen mainly include SQL interviews getting a lot of follow-ups, like assumptions about the data or how you’d explain query limitations to a PM/the rest of the team. For modeling questions, the focus is more on judgment. So don’t just practice answering which model you’d use, but also think about how to communicate constraints, failure modes, trade-offs, etc. Essentially, don’t just rely on AI to generate answers. You still have to do the explaining and thinking yourself, and that requires deeper practice. I’m curious though how data science/analytics candidates are experiencing this. Has anything changed with your interview experience in light of AI? Have you adapted your interview prep to accommodate this shift (if any)? submitted by /u/KitchenTaste7229 [link] [comments]
- Current role only does data science 1/4 of the yearTitle. The rest of the year I’m more doing data engineering/software engineering/business analyst type stuff. (I know that’s a lot of different fields but trust me). Will this hinder my long term career? I plan to stay here for 5 years so they pay for my grad program and vest my 401k. As of now I’m basically creating one xgboost model a year and just doing analysis for the rest of the year based off that model. (Hard to explain without explaining my entire job, basically we are the stakeholders of our own models in a way, with oversight of course). I’m just worried in 5 years when I apply to new jobs I won’t be able to talk about much data science. Our team wants to do more sexy stuff like computer vision but we are too busy with regulatory fillings that it’s never a priority. The good news is I have great job security because of this. The bad news is I don’t do any experimentation or “fun” data science. submitted by /u/Tenet_Bull [link] [comments]