•1 min read•from Machine Learning
Getting sabotaged by a reviewer at IJCAI [D]
Our take
Navigating the review process at IJCAI can be challenging, especially when faced with a reviewer who may not have fully engaged with your work. In this case, a reviewer has made inaccurate claims and requested additional experiments that contradict IJCAI policy. It’s crucial to address these concerns effectively. Consider reaching out to the program committee via the chairing tool to clarify the situation. Document your responses carefully, and focus on defending your paper based on its content rather than performing unnecessary additional experiments.
Recently got the reviews back from ijcai, now all is good except for this one reviewer who has not read the paper in depth, and is making false statements in the review.
This reviewer is saying that some stuff is not explored which is clearly shown in the paper. They are also angry that we did not cite a particular work, and suggests us to do extra experiments on that work (which is against ijcai policy)
What should we do, he is clearly sabotaging us, do we reach out to PC via chairing tool? Do PC respond to query like this? Do we include extra experiments in the rebuttal?
[link] [comments]
Read on the original site
Open the publisher's page for the full experience