•1 min read•from Machine Learning
Is reproducing or implementing a paper considered research? [R]
Our take
In the pursuit of advanced studies, the question of whether reproducing or implementing results from an existing paper qualifies as credible research is significant. Engaging in this process can demonstrate your understanding of the field and your ability to apply theoretical knowledge practically. While original research is highly valued, validating or extending known findings through comparative analysis can contribute meaningfully to the academic community.
I completed my bachelors recently and I plan to applying to a masters program either this cycle or the next. Unfortunately, I did not publish any papers or do any research during my undergrad. Right now I’m in a research internship which is coming to and soon and it’s unlikely that I’ll get to publish a paper. I would like to know if reproducing results from a known paper for validation or extension or a comparative analysis counts as credible research. It’s the only thing I could find to do independently.
[link] [comments]
Read on the original site
Open the publisher's page for the full experience
Tagged with
#generative AI for data analysis#Excel alternatives for data analysis#rows.com#natural language processing for spreadsheets#conversational data analysis#data analysis tools#research#masters program#reproducing results#bachelors#research internship#credible research#publishing papers#known paper#comparative analysis#doing research#validation#extension#undergrad#paper