Proper maintenance of game activity table
Our take
I'm part of a team of a rather small hobby game that we've been running for many years now. We've been running simple activity summaries in hours spent like this monthly, ever since beginning in April 2017. They simply go like this:
- GM Matt - 65.7h
- M Aiden - 54.3h
- K Hawk - 32.1h
- K Tell - 30.0h
- M Poe - 27.6h
- T Tribux - 25.4h
- M Vair - 24.5h
- K Rodian - 23.3h
- K Eventide - 20.1h
- T Crab - 14.4h
- M Voss- 14.3h
- M Teir - 9.1h
- M Vallin - 4.4h
- T Forrte - 0.5h
They're posted monthly so there are similar tables for May 2017, June 2017 and so forth up to April 2026.
I want to start storing them all in Excel, this is what I did so far:
The sum part for each year is simply:
=SUM(D3:L3)
and so on. Then there's a final column "ALLTIME" where I sum everything to the left except the columns with yearly sums.
This works so far, but I'm wondering if there's a better approach that's gonna be more comfortable in the future if I want to extract more data. I have zero experience with data management and Excel, this is what came intuitively to me, but I want to know if there isn't something that will bite me in the ass in the future.
[link] [comments]
Read on the original site
Open the publisher's page for the full experience
Related Articles
- How to deal with a bulky spreadsheet that is starting to hit the limits of Excel?Hello all, I have been venturing on quite the Excel journey the past year or so. I made a corporate spreadsheet that is approaching 500k formulas and that is starting to get serious speed issues at this point. It is 2026, so I conversed with ChatGPT several times regarding the speed issue, but realized I am way better off asking the experts here anyways. What is the problem So, my spreadsheet imports flat databases with specific information regarding objects that need further analysing. The imported flat databases run from say A tot CC or something, from which I probably draw about 12-15 datafields that are used for further analysis. It 'may' be more in the future. Afterwards, said data gets 'enriched' (manually) by things that aren't in the database, also because said data needs a human eye that cannot be automated. So far, so good. Right now, each object gets analysed from several different angles. As it stands, my spreadsheet runs from A until NA or something on the Formula Page. Many columns receive data from preceding columns, that are in the turn the result of many (slightly complex) logical IF or IFS tests, many of which are nested 3 or 4 deep. Often, they work in conjunction with X.LOOKUP to retrieve values, as the columns on the formula page are not equal. For example: A until BC on the Formula Page may analyze 150 objects, BD until DD may analyse 100 objects (from the same dataset, so narrower), and so forths. Thus a lot of X.LOOKUP is required, also because the first 'block' comes up with values that need to be found with X.LOOKUP. Also, values need to be retrieved from the flat database 'import' page with X.LOOKUP. Finally, X.LOOKUP is an insurance compared to FILTER, as I am not fully convinced that empty values in the flat database always contain a space (" "). To get to the point I use many IF, IFS, AND, and if need be, OR, formulas. Thinks: tens of thousands, probably in excess of 100k. These are compounded with X.LOOKUP, or X.LOOKUP gets used copiously without those. Here too, think tens of thousands. These formulas are - as much as possible - in array format, even though I find it controversial to do that as I consider how it can create a chain of updates throughout the spreadsheet. 'Dependencies' is the name of the game, with one object receiving many possible alterations / adjustments due to manual input data, for which the spreadsheet needs to provide. Right now, when I update a value, it may take up to 4 seconds to update the spreadsheet, which is already beyond the annoyance point for me. This leads me to these (hopefully) simple questions: Is it smart to use array formulas, knowing that each thing I change should only impact that one object line (for example, row 488) and none other? It is important to mention that object 1 does not influence object 488, or any other. Any manual data field only effects the object in the row it is in. In my mind, array formulas do not make sense in that regard, as it can result in a cascade of updates, but apparantly array formulas are 'way more efficient'. Is use of a VBA library the way to go to reduce lag and create more of an instant spreadsheet again? I am not able to code in VBA yet, but I am in the slow process of learning it regardless. Alternatively: should I use LET whenever a repeated lookup is needed in the same formula? Really looking for to your answers! submitted by /u/EvolvedRevolution [link] [comments]
- Formatting question for automating data entryIm going to try to articulate what I need and if it’s possible to do inside excel. At my job I have to record the amount of patrons using our facilities. and specify what particular services are being used. at the end of each quarter. (3 month period) I must tally up all the numbers and provide a total for each aspect of our facility as well as the total overall. For example. 1st quarter numbers. 100 patrons used theatre. 250 patrons used Game room 450 patrons used computer lab so on and so forth. Now that you have the gist in your head. Imagine a spreadsheet where the first form is just a data entry sheet. it’s essentially just a box that never changes. You input the numbers for the week, and that data gets automatically moved to a different cell that has the total amount. so that at the end of the quarter I can easily see my total without having to backtrack or tediously add. if anyone has some insight on how I can do this Please reach out. If you have any questions about my wording or understanding exactly what I mean please also reach out. If you read all this I appreciate your time. submitted by /u/Beneficial-Yard-9006 [link] [comments]
- Monthly tracking workbook I use to track employee sales metrics; Trying to find a way to make the process less labour intensiveTruly having a hard to describing my issue effectively but hoping someone can help. First time posting here and I'm by no means an expert with excel, so please be kind! I have a monthly workbook where I track each employees revenue and other metrics. Every 2 weeks for payroll, I provide a print out of these numbers, and the payroll sheet pulls data from multiple sheets in the workbook. For example, every workbook has a separate sheet for each day of the month, titled "1" through "31". I have pay period sheets, so I'll use one titled "04.02.26 - 04.15.26". Then I'll have the data for each employee pulled from multiple sheets. For example, I use the formula =SUM('2:15'!E3) to pull the sales data from each day of that period for the specific employee. This works quite well. However, when I create a new month's spreadsheet, I have to manually alter this formula for each employee and for each data point (more than just revenue, at least 6 different data points for 7 employees). Is there a way to automate this? For example, a cell or two where I'm able to enter the date range and all of the formulas update to that date range for the corresponding pages? I'm sorry of this post is confusing. Truly it's confusing even typing it! submitted by /u/Ok_Smile9222 [link] [comments]
- Request for improved methodI work in accounts payable for a company and took over some additional duties a few months ago. One of those duties is keeping a tracker/log of all bills that come in. A tracker in excel was handed over to me. While I’ve improved many things with this tracker so far, I’m looking to make a major change but unsure how to go about it. This tracker has 110k rows of data and has columns with data up to column “FZ”. New rows of data are added daily. Old rows are “archived” as soon as possible. I’m no excel pro, but can hold my own and have learned along the way. Issue: large dataset presents challenges with excel freezing and/or crashing Disclaimer: I cannot remove any rows or columns. Question: is there a better way to handle this data? Ie. tools in excel, using something other than excel, etc? submitted by /u/Visible-Question-786 [link] [comments]