•1 min read•from Machine Learning
Stanford Paper review [D]
Our take
Have you ever used Stanford Paper Review before submitting your work? I recently tried it for my paper and received some valuable feedback, although I’m not entirely convinced by all of its suggestions. I'm grappling with how much of the feedback to take seriously. I’d love to hear about your experiences with this tool. Do you consider the feedback reliable? Your insights could really help others navigating the decision of whether to trust this resource for enhancing their submissions.
Has anyone here used Stanford Paper Review before submitting a paper?
I just tried it on mine and it gave some useful feedback, but I’m not fully convinced by all the suggestions it made. I’m having a hard time deciding how much of it to actually take seriously.
What’s your experience with it? Do you find the feedback reliable?
[link] [comments]
Read on the original site
Open the publisher's page for the full experience
Tagged with
#rows.com#real-time data collaboration#financial modeling with spreadsheets#real-time collaboration#Stanford Paper Review#feedback#paper submission#suggestions#experience#reliable#useful#convincing#seriously#deciding#comments#submitted#experiences#hard time#paper#discussion