Stop using ungodly INDEX math to flatten 2D schedules. TOCOL() + FILTER() is all you need.
Our take
In today’s fast-evolving workspace, the way we organize and access tasks can determine our productivity. The article we’re discussing offers a refreshing take on simplifying a common pain point: the messy task lists that flood spreadsheets with "Morning Task" and "Afternoon Task" columns. For many users, these exports often leave behind a nightmare of empty cells and redundant data, making it nearly impossible to build a clean Pivot Table. This isn’t just a minor inconvenience—it’s a frustrating barrier that stops people before they even begin.
The solution highlighted here is both elegant and effective. By leveraging dynamic array functions like TOCOL and FILTER, users can transform a chaotic grid into a coherent, readable list without relying on outdated nested formulas. What makes this approach stand out is its clarity and adaptability, whether you’re working with older versions of Excel or the latest updates. The article also emphasizes a shift in perspective: instead of fighting complex spreadsheet logic, it encourages embracing streamlined tools that deliver real results.
This isn’t just about saving time—it’s about reclaiming control over your workflow. The author’s insight resonates because it addresses a problem many face: the gap between what data suggests and what users actually see. By pointing out how old methods fail and introducing modern alternatives, the piece empowers readers to take charge. Whether you’re a power user or someone new to spreadsheets, this advice is valuable.
It’s worth noting that in a world where efficiency matters, small changes can lead to big wins. The article reminds us that sometimes the simplest fixes—like using the right functions—can unlock significant value. As we move forward, the focus should remain on tools that are not only powerful but also intuitive. This piece makes a strong case for that balance, making it a useful read for anyone looking to enhance their Excel skills.
If you’re still wrestling with that [empty] string or struggling to match status labels, take a breath. This article shows you there’s a better way. The takeaway is clear: don’t let outdated tricks hold you back—seek clarity, and let the right tools do the heavy lifting.
This comes up constantly. Someone gets handed a resource tracker or a system export where tasks are split across "Morning Task" and "Afternoon Task" columns, and they need a flat list to dump into a Pivot Table. Simple enough ask.
The fun part? Half these exports don't even leave cells blank - they write out [empty] as literal text, so any trick that relies on detecting blank cells just falls flat. And on top of that there's usually a Status column you need to drag along, but only once per person - not stamped next to every single task row like a broken rubber stamp.
Old solution was some deeply cursed nested INDEX/ROW formula that nobody could read six months later. If you're still doing that, please stop.
On Office 365 you can handle the whole thing in one shot:
=LET(data, A2:C11, status, D2:D11, col_data, TOCOL(data), col_status, TOCOL(IF(SEQUENCE(1,COLUMNS(data))=1, status, "")), FILTER(HSTACK(col_data, col_status), col_data<>"[empty]"))
TOCOL flattens the grid, the IF/SEQUENCE combo makes sure the status only shows up next to the name and not repeated under every task, HSTACK glues the two columns together, and FILTER kills all the [empty] noise. Keep your ranges the same size throughout or you'll get a #VALUE! staring back at you.
These dynamic array functions honestly flew under the radar for a lot of people who don't spend their weekends reading Excel update logs. Hope it saves someone a headache.
Note; for Excel 2019 and 2021 you can use power query. However in the 2021 version you can use the filter and sequence function.
In 2021 version; the formulas are;
=FILTER(INDEX(A2:C11,MOD(SEQUENCE(30)-1,10)+1,INT((SEQUENCE(30)-1)/10)+1),INDEX(A2:C11,MOD(SEQUENCE(30)-1,10)+1,INT((SEQUENCE(30)-1)/10)+1)<>"[empty]")
and
=FILTER(IF(INT((SEQUENCE(30)-1)/10)+1=1,INDEX(D2:D11,MOD(SEQUENCE(30)-1,10)+1),""),INDEX(A2:C11,MOD(SEQUENCE(30)-1,10)+1,INT((SEQUENCE(30)-1)/10)+1)<>"[empty]")
one thank go at user for pointing it out to me Excel_User_1977
[link] [comments]
Read on the original site
Open the publisher's page for the full experience
Related Articles
- Is there a way to reference an array of arrays?Is there a way to get Excel to use an array of arrays in in a formula? Instead of writing a formula that references an array and dragging it down through a column, can I write the formula in a way that results in an output of SUM(O2#),SUM(O3#),SUM(O4#),SUM(O5#),...,SUM(O1000#)}? I work with enormous data sets, but they vary in size. Since I need the workbooks to work with any amount of data, I end up dragging formulas down extra far, leaving rows that just output empyy values when the data doesn't reach that far. If I can make the formula reference an array of arrays then I could eliminate all those garbage rows. Thank you. Unfortunately, because a security restrictions, I can't use macros or VBA at all. I need to do it everything through standard excel syntax. EDIT: Sorry, I didn't make it clear that I used SUM() as an example to try and simplify and generalize. Here's a more explicit example of what I'm doing: ID Data Col C Col D A 14 =UNIQUE(ID#) =IF($C1="","",LET(ArrSt1,TRIMRANGE(DROP($B:$B,4),2),ArrSt3,TRIMRANGE(DROP($H:$H,4),2),ArrA,(FILTER(ArrSt3,ArrSt1=C2,)),TRANSPOSE(FILTER(ArrA,ArrA<>"")))) A 23 =IF($C2="","",LET(ArrSt1,TRIMRANGE(DROP($B:$B,4),2),ArrSt3,TRIMRANGE(DROP($H:$H,4),2),ArrA,(FILTER(ArrSt3,ArrSt1=C2)),TRANSPOSE(FILTER(ArrA,ArrA<>"")))) A 42 =IF($C3="","",LET(ArrSt1,TRIMRANGE(DROP($B:$B,4),2),ArrSt3,TRIMRANGE(DROP($H:$H,4),2),ArrA,(FILTER(ArrSt3,ArrSt1=C3,)),TRANSPOSE(FILTER(ArrA,ArrA<>"")))) B 1 =IF($C4="","",LET(ArrSt1,TRIMRANGE(DROP($B:$B,4),2),ArrSt3,TRIMRANGE(DROP($H:$H,4),2),ArrA,(FILTER(ArrSt3,ArrSt1=C4,)),TRANSPOSE(FILTER(ArrA,ArrA<>"")))) B 2 =IF($C5="","",LET(ArrSt1,TRIMRANGE(DROP($B:$B,4),2),ArrSt3,TRIMRANGE(DROP($H:$H,4),2),ArrA,(FILTER(ArrSt3,ArrSt1=C5,)),TRANSPOSE(FILTER(ArrA,ArrA<>"")))) B =IF($C6="","",LET(ArrSt1,TRIMRANGE(DROP($B:$B,4),2),ArrSt3,TRIMRANGE(DROP($H:$H,4),2),ArrA,(FILTER(ArrSt3,ArrSt1=C6,)),TRANSPOSE(FILTER(ArrA,ArrA<>"")))) B =IF($C7="","",LET(ArrSt1,TRIMRANGE(DROP($B:$B,4),2),ArrSt3,TRIMRANGE(DROP($H:$H,4),2),ArrA,(FILTER(ArrSt3,ArrSt1=C7,)),TRANSPOSE(FILTER(ArrA,ArrA<>"")))) B 90 =IF($C8="","",LET(ArrSt1,TRIMRANGE(DROP($B:$B,4),2),ArrSt3,TRIMRANGE(DROP($H:$H,4),2),ArrA,(FILTER(ArrSt3,ArrSt1=C8,)),TRANSPOSE(FILTER(ArrA,ArrA<>"")))) B 94 =IF($C9="","",LET(ArrSt1,TRIMRANGE(DROP($B:$B,4),2),ArrSt3,TRIMRANGE(DROP($H:$H,4),2),ArrA,(FILTER(ArrSt3,ArrSt1=C9,)),TRANSPOSE(FILTER(ArrA,ArrA<>"")))) =IF($C10="","",LET(ArrSt1,TRIMRANGE(DROP($B:$B,4),2),ArrSt3,TRIMRANGE(DROP($H:$H,4),2),ArrA,(FILTER(ArrSt3,ArrSt1=C10)),TRANSPOSE(FILTER(ArrA,ArrA<>"")))) ... =IF($C1000="","",LET(ArrSt1,TRIMRANGE(DROP($B:$B,4),2),ArrSt3,TRIMRANGE(DROP($H:$H,4),2),ArrA,(FILTER(ArrSt3,ArrSt1=C1000,)),TRANSPOSE(FILTER(ArrA,ArrA<>"")))) Output: ID Data Col C Col D Col E Col F F A 14 A 14 23 42 A 23 B 1 2 90 94 A 42 "" B 1 "" B 2 "" B "" B "" B 90 "" B 94 "" "" ... "" There are a lot of data manipulations omitted, so if something seems weird (like the empty cells in Data Col) please ignore it. The questions is how to eliminate the unneeded rows in Col D. Thank you. EDIT2: Studying the BYROW, SCAN, and MAP suggestions, led to this page on Exceljet, https://exceljet.net/glossary/array-of-arrays , that suggests my question is a known problem in Excel's engine and there is no work-around. Thank you to everyone who tried to help. submitted by /u/TwitchyDingo [link] [comments]
- Cell merging / formatting formulasThis might be an odd one. I'm not that skilled with excel as my use of in within my job is pretty limited. However, I tend to use this template my predecessor made to summarize data from our program. Works well, just a simple ='SHEET 1'!A1 for all cells. The first two images give an example. After the data is ported, I have to get rid of the zeros between the data and write system names. When it comes to pasting it on letters, the names are bolded, upped a font size, and two of the cells are merged (3rd image) This gets a bit tedious as the lists can get pretty long so I've been trying to figure out how to streamline it on my own. My idea has so far has been to have a separate cell detect when I'm finished adding my data and then format the aforementioned cells (4th image). For the life of me, just can't figure out how to write a formula to do it. What I would need is for the formula to detect a 1 (could be anything) in cell G10. It would then check for any blank cells in columns A and B. Once found, it would merge & center, bold the text, increase the font size, and align right. Is this only possible with a macro? I've been unable to find any formulas that could accomplish this. https://preview.redd.it/853mpr4jspog1.png?width=788&format=png&auto=webp&s=943a34a57f1d7c7f88256dd89b81b9c6fc301e34 https://preview.redd.it/e3w6ms4jspog1.png?width=453&format=png&auto=webp&s=9b189fa77d6638b627f8676dad60bc148753617c https://preview.redd.it/msh6ys4jspog1.png?width=411&format=png&auto=webp&s=d5f5025b315f24fd5f3a64c6e07e019abd3a77ab https://preview.redd.it/7j66tt4jspog1.png?width=936&format=png&auto=webp&s=1faa4df12ee74892f5fa9dc27ac95621280cf3c5 submitted by /u/Extension_Train9093 [link] [comments]
- Excel Performance optimisation tips!Working in demand planning I have got it the point where I am making some pretty advanced files using a suite of techniques. My files often have lots of rows, with lots of Columns of complex formula including with sumifs, xloopup, ifs & Let. I’ve not advanced to using tables regularly though as I find the constraints & syntax annoying but am trying to get there & have started using power query to blend data for output analysis. The problem I am encountering is I filter ALOT drilling down into product groups etc, & excel tends to ‘hang’ a lot with ‘Not Responding’. Now I’m not sure it’s due to an underpowered machine (intel core i7 HP Elitebook) or, more likely lots of complex formula referencing ranges or tables. My question to the hive brain: share your optimisation tips & tricks! -Can Lamda combined with Let speed things up? -Are Tables vital to speeding up complex sumifs & lookups? - are match helper columns combined with Index leaner & faster than xlookup? Hit me with best tips & tricks! submitted by /u/NZGRAVELDAD [link] [comments]
- Built a workbook to track audit prep tasks for my internship and now it's gotten out of hand in a way I don't fully understand anymoreI started simple. One sheet, a list of tasks, a status column with a dropdown, a due date column, conditional formatting to turn rows red when something was overdue. That was fine and I used it every day and it was genuinely helpful. Then I started adding things. I added a summary tab that pulls counts by status using COUNTIF which works fine. Then I added a column for "assigned senior" because I wanted to filter by person, and then I wanted the summary tab to break down by senior too, so I wrote a COUNTIFS with two criteria and that also works. The problem is I then tried to add a column that flags tasks where the due date is within 3 days AND the status is not "complete," and I wrote something that I thought made sense but it keeps returning TRUE on rows where the status actually is complete and I cannot figure out why. The formula I have in the flag column is =AND(D2-TODAY()<=3, C2<>"Complete") where D is due date and C is status. It looks right to me when I read it out loud but two rows that are marked Complete in column C are still flagging as TRUE and I've checked the spelling three times. I'm wondering if there's a hidden space issue in the dropdown values because I set up the validation list by typing directly into the data validation box and not referencing a range, but I'm not sure how to check that efficently without going cell by cell. The broader question is also whether this whole structure is getting unwieldy and I should just use a proper table with structured references instead of normal ranges, because right now any time I add a row I have to manually drag formulas down and it's starting to feel like I'm fighting the file more than using it. submitted by /u/MilesKettlepond [link] [comments]