1 min readfrom Machine Learning

Thoughts and experience on ML journals [D]

Our take

In recent reflections, I've been contemplating a shift from ML conferences to journals, primarily due to some frustrating experiences with the conference review process. While my familiarity with journals is limited, I find myself hesitant to submit to venues like JMLR due to their lengthy review timelines and my preference for shorter papers. TMLR appears promising, yet I'm eager to explore alternative options.

Recently I’ve been thinking about shifting from conferences to journals due to a few bad experiences with ML conferences reviewing process. The truth is I don’t really have much experience with journals, and I rarely read papers from them.

I don’t really want to submit to something like JMLR because of the extremely long waiting times, and also because my papers tend to be shorter.

From what I understand, TMLR seems like a great choice, but I’m really curious about alternatives. Do you guys have any experience or thoughts on journals like Neurocomputing, Neural Networks, Machine Learning, etc., in terms of how selective they are and overall quality?

They’re all considered Q1, but I’m not really sure what that means in the conference-oriented ML world.

submitted by /u/kostaspap90
[link] [comments]

Read on the original site

Open the publisher's page for the full experience

View original article

Related Articles

Tagged with

#machine learning in spreadsheet applications#financial modeling with spreadsheets#rows.com#Excel alternatives for data analysis#Excel alternatives#ML journals#Machine Learning#conferences#TMLR#reviewing process#Neurocomputing#Neural Networks#JMLR#waiting times#overall quality#experience#selective#Q1#bad experiences#alternatives