3 min readfrom Machine Learning

Time Series Modeling Needs a Dynamical Systems Perspective [R]

Our take

Time series modeling stands to gain significantly from a dynamical systems perspective. Our #ICML2026 position paper argues that acknowledging the underlying dynamical systems (often chaotic) that generate time series data is crucial for addressing key challenges. Dynamical systems reconstruction offers deeper understanding than mere forecasting, enabling out-of-domain generalization and predicting long-term behavior. We compare models and propose focusing on dynamical systems-informed training, pretraining on simulations, and reconsidering recurrent neural networks. For further exploration of related world models, see our recent work on DVD-JEPA.
Time Series Modeling Needs a Dynamical Systems Perspective [R]

The recent position paper advocating for a dynamical systems perspective in time series modeling, presented at #ICML2026, strikes a profoundly important chord. Current time series models, while demonstrating impressive short-term forecasting capabilities, often fall short when confronted with the complexities of real-world systems. This paper argues, convincingly, that a deeper understanding of the underlying dynamical rules governing these systems is crucial for achieving true out-of-domain generalization and predicting long-term behavior—a capability that remains stubbornly elusive. It’s a shift in focus reminiscent of the recent interest in world models like those explored in DVD-JEPA: an open-source, fully-reproducible JEPA world model [DVD-JEPA: an open-source, fully-reproducible JEPA world model [P]], which similarly emphasizes understanding underlying system dynamics rather than simply memorizing patterns. The critique of transformer architectures, specifically, is particularly compelling, highlighting how their inherent limitations in capturing temporal recursion can hinder their ability to model dynamical systems effectively.

The paper's recommendations—prioritizing DSR-specific training techniques, pretraining on dynamical systems simulations, and a return to modern RNNs—offer a concrete roadmap for advancing the field. The emphasis on training methodologies over purely architectural innovation is a refreshing perspective, suggesting that smarter approaches to leveraging existing models can yield significant improvements. Consider, for example, the challenges addressed by AWS in adding multi-region replication to Amazon Cognito Identity Service [AWS Adds Multi-Region Replication to Amazon Cognito Identity Service], where ensuring data consistency and resilience across distributed systems demands a careful consideration of underlying dynamics. Similarly, the ongoing complexities surrounding Claude Fable 5 on Bedrock [Claude Fable 5 on Bedrock Requires Sharing Inference Data with Anthropic] underscore the need for robust and adaptable models that can handle shifting data distributions and evolving system states – precisely the kinds of issues a dynamical systems framework seeks to address. These are all reflections of the core problem: systems evolve, and models must account for that evolution.

The call to address "hard problems" like topological shifts and tipping points is particularly astute. While out-of-distribution generalization is an important consideration, the more fundamental challenge lies in understanding how systems transition between different dynamical regimes. This requires moving beyond simply predicting the next data point and towards developing models that can anticipate and adapt to qualitative changes in system behavior. The authors’ assertion that universal properties like attractors and bifurcations can inform TS modeling across diverse domains is a powerful argument for a more mechanistic and transferable approach. Imagine the potential for applying such insights to areas like climate modeling, financial forecasting, or even medical diagnostics—all fields where understanding long-term system behavior is paramount. A focus on mathematically tractable and interpretable models aligns perfectly with this goal, fostering trust and facilitating the integration of domain expertise.

Ultimately, this paper represents a timely and insightful call to action for the time series modeling community. It encourages a shift away from purely data-driven approaches towards a more fundamentally grounded understanding of the systems we are trying to model. The question now is whether this perspective will gain sufficient traction to drive significant changes in research and practice. Will we see a renewed emphasis on dynamical systems theory within the machine learning curriculum, and a corresponding proliferation of models that prioritize interpretability and long-term prediction over purely statistical performance? The next few years promise to be a fascinating period of exploration as researchers grapple with these important challenges and strive to unlock the full potential of time series data.

Time Series Modeling Needs a Dynamical Systems Perspective [R]

In our #ICML2026 position paper we argue a dynamical systems perspective is needed to drive time series (TS) modeling forward: https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.16864

Essentially all time series in nature and engineering come from some underlying dynamical system (DS), mostly chaotic for complex systems, and acknowledging this helps to address many open problems.

Dynamical systems reconstruction (DSR) goes beyond mere forecasting and gives us an understanding of the dynamical rules that underlie observed time series. This in turn may enable true out-of-domain generalization and predicting a system’s long-term behavior, something current TS models cannot do. In the paper, we compare a variety of custom-trained and recent foundation models for TS and DSR w.r.t. short- & long-term forecasting.

Specifically, we suggest:

1) Put a focus on DSR-specific training techniques and objectives in TS model training, such as generalized teacher forcing (https://proceedings.mlr.press/v202/hess23a.html). These will enable capturing long-term statistical properties and dynamical structure, and at the same time help massively reducing parameter load and complexity of TS models. Proper training is more important than model architecture!

2) Pretrain TS models on simulations from dynamical systems, rather than on artificially created time series functions. These will yield much more natural priors for real-world TS. Chaotic systems in particular contain a rich temporal structure and many timescales (often an infinite skeleton of unstable periodic orbits of any period).

3) Move away from transformers, back to modern RNNs. DS are defined by recursions in time. By ignoring this and potentially further coarse-graining signals, transformers lose essential dynamical information, making them generally incapable of capturing a system’s dynamical rules. This is evidenced by their failure to forecast a DS’ long-term statistical or geometrical structure.

4) Address the hard problems in TS modeling: Topological shifts (https://proceedings.mlr.press/v235/goring24a.html). Although in itself tricky, the really hard problem in TS forecasting is not so much mere out-of-distribution shifts, but changes that drive a system across tipping points or into different dynamical regimes, where the vector field topology changes.

5) DS properties like attractors or bifurcations are universal – acknowledging this in TS modeling will give a kind of mechanistic and transferable understanding of TS properties that is independent from specific (physical, medical, …) domain knowledge. It therefore also pays off to put a focus on mathematically tractable and interpretable models.

With a great team of shared-first & co-authors, Christoph Hemmer, Charlotte Doll, Lukas Eisenmann & Florian Hess!

submitted by /u/DangerousFunny1371
[link] [comments]

Read on the original site

Open the publisher's page for the full experience

View original article

Tagged with

#real-time data collaboration#real-time collaboration#financial modeling with spreadsheets#financial modeling#natural language processing for spreadsheets#generative AI for data analysis#Excel alternatives for data analysis#rows.com#AI formula generation techniques#modern spreadsheet innovations#natural language processing#Dynamical Systems#Time Series Modeling#Dynamical Systems Reconstruction#TS#DS#Forecasting#Long-Term Forecasting#Chaotic Systems#RNNs