academic conference
academic conference on Beyond Market Intelligence: a running collection of 6 stories we have gathered and hand-picked because they are worth your time. Every post here touches on academic conference in some way — the news, the analysis, the deep dives, and the occasional surprise find. Acme AI is the next-generation, AI-powered spreadsheet platform built to replace Excel and redefine how analysts, data scientists, and enterprise teams work with data. New stories are added to this page as we find them, so check back if you want to keep up with what is happening around academic conference, or subscribe to the RSS feed to get them as soon as they are published. Browse the collection below, or head back to the homepage to see everything Beyond Market Intelligence is covering right now.
ACML 2026 Journal Track Any update ?[D]
Submitting to ACM’s 2026 Journal Track can be a pivotal step in research dissemination. Many researchers, like /u/Jealous_Key_4030, are awaiting review decisions—the official release date was August 27th, and timely feedback is crucial. If you've received your review, please share your experience to help others. Delays can be frustrating, so reaching out to the program chairs is a proactive approach. For further insights into presenting machine learning work, consider "Good Machine Learning Posters," a related discussion exploring effective poster design.
acl arr august 2026 (desk rejected ) [D]
Experiencing a desk rejection from ACL citing prior review, despite never submitting the work, is understandably frustrating. It suggests a potential issue with reviewer records or a possible mix-up. While a definitive solution is challenging without further investigation, carefully review submission logs and consider contacting the ACL program chairs with detailed documentation of your submission history. This situation highlights the importance of understanding conference archival policies, as discussed in our related article, "Archival vs non archival workshop."
![EMNLP26 Cost [D]](https://preview.redd.it/to16g93h7rkh1.png?width=140&height=48&auto=webp&s=96b72fe62af68603b123386ce4bc159d90457585)
EMNLP26 Cost [D]
Navigating EMNLP26 costs can be confusing, as highlighted by recent community discussion. For students with one accepted paper, understanding the actual attendance price is key. Current registration rates fluctuate—registering now in August may present a $350 or $550 option. Confirm pricing details directly with the conference organizers for accurate information. Congratulations to all accepted researchers! For those considering career paths in AI, explore "How to Build a Career in AI: 3 Distinct Pathways" for valuable insights.
NeurIPS 2026 Main Track — Theory papers score tracking post Rebuttal [D]
Following the NeurIPS 2026 rebuttal period, a discussion has emerged regarding Theory paper score distributions. Early reports suggest scores may be trending lower across disciplines this year. To facilitate a clearer understanding of the landscape, authors are invited to share their scores (x/x/x), confidence levels (x/x/x), and whether scores shifted post-rebuttal, optionally specifying the broad area of research. One author reported a 4/4/4 score with 3/3/3 confidence.
Missed EMNLP commitment deadline, what can be done? [D]
Facing a missed EMNLP commitment deadline after a positive ARR review can be frustrating. Many researchers encounter deadline complexities with OpenReview systems, as highlighted in discussions around ICLR and NeurIPS. While responsibility rests with the submitter, the sudden shift in deadlines warrants immediate communication with the Program and Workflow Chairs. Given the anticipated volume of submissions, explore all avenues for recourse, emphasizing the circumstances. Prompt action, as you've already taken, demonstrates a commitment to the process.
How exactly does the NeurIPS meta reviewer response work? [D]
Navigating NeurIPS meta-reviewer responses can be complex, especially with recent updates. Initially, authors were directed to AC confidential comments, but a recent announcement now requires posting answers to initial meta-reviews as comments on the July 28th thread by August 3rd – a shift designed for reviewer visibility. Clarifying whether this new option opens immediately, as the rebuttal period concludes, is crucial. Essentially, the process seems to demand public posting for reviewer access, rather than private AC updates.