ICML
ICML on Beyond Market Intelligence: a running collection of 55 stories we have gathered and hand-picked because they are worth your time. Every post here touches on icml in some way — the news, the analysis, the deep dives, and the occasional surprise find. Acme AI is the next-generation, AI-powered spreadsheet platform built to replace Excel and redefine how analysts, data scientists, and enterprise teams work with data. New stories are added to this page as we find them, so check back if you want to keep up with what is happening around icml, or subscribe to the RSS feed to get them as soon as they are published. Browse the collection below, or head back to the homepage to see everything Beyond Market Intelligence is covering right now.
Prompt-engineering paper accepted to ICML [R]
Our team's recent paper, "Verbalized Sampling: How to Mitigate Mode Collapse and Unlock LLM Diversity," was accepted to ICML, presenting a surprisingly straightforward prompt-engineering technique to enhance Large Language Model (LLM) output diversity. While a rigorous theoretical analysis remains challenging, the results demonstrate a tangible improvement—simply altering the prompt can significantly impact sampling behavior. Though some categorize this as "modern machine learning," we believe it merits broader discussion.
Journals vs Conferences ML Research [R]
The shifting landscape of ML research publication is a hot topic, with conferences like NeurIPS and ICML rapidly gaining prominence over traditional journals. This shift, observed by many, likely stems from the AI boom’s accelerated demand for new findings and the inherently faster dissemination cycles of conferences. Acceptance rates also play a role, enabling quicker delivery of research. While journals remain valuable, the conference model’s agility is proving compelling.
Google's Agentic Peer-Reviewer Handled ~10K Papers at ICML/STOC — Formal Research Paper Now Out [R]
Google has demonstrated a significant advancement in AI-assisted scientific review, deploying an agentic peer-reviewer across ICML and STOC—handling approximately 10,000 papers with a remarkably swift 30-minute turnaround. A newly released research paper details the system's capabilities, revealing it identifies 34% more mathematical errors than zero-shot prompting alone. This establishes a precedent for AI-automated review at conference scale, now formally documented. For further insights into related infrastructure challenges, explore "Presentation: Million PDFs," detailing modern document infrastructure solutions.
Would you let an ML PhD student graduate without a top-tier paper? [D]
The question facing many machine learning PhD advisors is stark: does a solid thesis alone warrant graduation when a top-tier publication is absent? Imagine guiding a student for four years, witnessing consistent work and a clear thesis direction, yet lacking a NeurIPS, ICML, or equivalent publication. Three first-author "A level" papers offer substantial evidence of capability. This post explores whether supporting graduation is justifiable, even without that ultimate benchmark.
Is ACL now irrelevant? [D]
Recent discussions suggest a concerning trend: diminishing value placed on ACL publications within the AI research community. While ACL remains an A+ venue—distinct from regional conferences—some perceive an ACL first-author paper as offering limited benefit for PhD applications. This shift reflects broader biases within "classical" CS, where AI venues are sometimes unfairly viewed as less rigorous. However, a strong ACL publication still demonstrates valuable expertise.
ICML (DL4C) Accepted ( Few queries ) [D]
Congratulations to /u/shifuThePandaGod on acceptance into DL4C @ICML 2026! This prestigious workshop offers a valuable opportunity to explore the future of deep learning. Many accepted participants have similar questions regarding logistics: attendance is typically encouraged, though not always strictly mandatory. Expect expenses beyond flights to include registration fees and potential accommodation costs. The acceptance email usually clarifies presentation format (poster or otherwise) – keep an eye out for updates.
Why do frontier AI labs send so many people to conferences? [D]
The prevalence of AI lab personnel—from OpenAI and Anthropic—at major conferences like ICML and Neurips has sparked considerable curiosity. While formal presentations may be limited, their attendance is largely driven by strategic recruitment and diligent exploration of emerging research. Frontier AI labs prioritize staying ahead of the curve, actively assessing talent and identifying potentially transformative breakthroughs. This proactive engagement ensures they remain future-focused, a similar approach to Vercel Labs’ recent open-sourcing of Zero-Native, demonstrating a commitment to innovation.
Worth going to ICML during ACL? [D]
Navigating conference choices with a strong paper portfolio—like yours with ACL and ICML—requires strategic prioritization. Given your job search focus in the U.S., attending ICML in Korea immediately after ACL in San Diego presents logistical and travel cost considerations. While ICML offers valuable networking opportunities, the distance may diminish its impact on your U.S. job prospects. Prioritize maximizing your presence at ACL, where you'll present your main paper and likely connect with U.S.-based researchers and recruiters.
Quant firms at ICML 2026 [D]
The significant presence of quantitative firms as Diamond sponsors at ICML 2026 signals a clear shift in the landscape of AI research and application. These firms, traditionally focused on finance, are increasingly recognizing the transformative power of machine learning and actively investing in its development. This surge reflects a growing need for advanced AI models to navigate complex market dynamics and optimize trading strategies.
When are ICML openreviews made public? [R]
When are ICML open reviews made public? This question is common among first-time attendees and participants eager to understand the timeline for accessing valuable feedback on submissions. Open reviews can enhance the collaborative spirit of the conference, offering insights into the peer review process. For those looking to dive deeper into related topics, check out "I built a tool to browse and plan CVPR workshop/tutorial days," which shares innovative solutions for managing event schedules. Engage with these resources to enrich your conference experience.
ICML paper checker is down? [D]
It seems you're not alone in facing challenges with the ICML paper checker, as it went down just before the submission deadline. Many researchers encounter similar frustrations, especially during critical moments like this. While you've already reached out to the publication chairs, connecting with others in the community can provide additional insights or solutions. For a broader perspective on navigating the academic landscape, you might find our article "How Much of a Shortcut Are Connections in Top AI Lab Hiring for PhD grads?" particularly helpful.
How long does it realistically take for you to produce an ICML/NeurIPS/ICLR-level paper? [D]
How long does it realistically take to develop a paper for top-tier ML conferences like ICML, NeurIPS, or ICLR? Researchers often grapple with timelines from the initial concept to submission and acceptance. Sharing insights from your lab or research experience can illuminate this process and help set realistic expectations. If you're interested in related discussions, check out our article "ICML paper checker is down? [D]" for perspectives on the challenges faced during submission.
Should I attend ICML as a junior? [D]
Attending ICML as a junior, especially with two accepted workshop papers, could be a pivotal step in your academic journey. The experience of presenting your work and networking with peers and experts can provide invaluable insights and opportunities for future research. While the cost may seem daunting, consider the long-term benefits of exposure and connections in the field. If you're still uncertain, exploring related resources like "STEM PhD's transitioning to MLE/Data" may offer additional perspectives on navigating your academic path.
[D] Is IEEE Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal Processing Reputable? [D]
The IEEE Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal Processing offers a platform for researchers exploring the intersection of machine learning and signal processing. While IEEE conferences can vary in reputation, this workshop may provide valuable exposure, especially for early-career researchers like undergraduates. If you feel your current research project isn't ready for top-tier conferences like ICML or NeurIPS, submitting here could be a worthwhile option. For additional insights on related topics, check out our article on "What to use for Sign Language Recognition."
Are ICML workshops worth attending? [D]
Attending workshops at A*-tier conferences like ICML can be a valuable experience, even if you miss out on the main conference ticket. These workshops offer unique opportunities for hands-on learning, networking with experts, and diving deeper into specialized topics. Given your background in an adjacent field, participating in these sessions can enhance your understanding of cutting-edge developments. For further insights into navigating complex tech environments, consider exploring our article on "The Schema Proliferation Problem in Kafka and Flink Pipelines.
Anyone heard from ICML about Oral decisions yet? [D]
Hi everyone, I’m reaching out to see if anyone has received notifications regarding oral decisions from ICML. My paper received a spotlight, and I was informed that decisions would be released by the end of the month. However, it was suggested that no notification would be sent if my paper didn’t make it for an oral presentation. If anyone has received confirmation, it would help clarify my status. Thanks for your insights!
Instructions for (ICML) workshop reviews [D]
As a reviewer for an ICML workshop, you may find yourself seeking clarity on review guidelines, including criteria and grading scales. While there may not be specific conventions outlined for workshop reviews, referring to the ICML's official reviewer instructions can provide a solid foundation for your evaluations. If you’re also looking to enhance your spreadsheet skills, consider checking out our article, "How to find the last value in an array with gaps Excel M365," for practical tips that can streamline your data management process.
ICML Proceedings-only [D]
Are you wondering whether a poster is required for proceedings-only papers at ICML? This question has surfaced in the community, and clarity is essential for authors navigating the submission process. If you're looking for insights or have specific questions, connecting with the ICML Program Chair can provide authoritative guidance. Additionally, check out our article "Deploying a Multistage Multimodal Recommender System on Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service" for practical insights into complex systems that may enhance your understanding of data management in a broader context.
First-time ICML workshop acceptance (GlobalSouthML) but can't afford to travel to South Korea. What are my options? [D]
Congratulations on your paper acceptance at the ICML 2026 GlobalSouthML workshop! It’s an exciting milestone, but the challenge of travel costs can be daunting. If attending in person isn’t feasible, consider the options available, such as the "Virtual Pass." This could allow your work to remain in the program. Additionally, explore potential financial aid for undergraduates from ICML or GlobalSouthML. For practical guidance on navigating conference submissions, you might find our article on how to locate the origin of an unreferenced value in Excel helpful.
Has anyone received decisions for the ICML 2026 GlobalSouthML workshop yet? [D]
Has anyone received decisions for the ICML 2026 GlobalSouthML workshop? The original notification deadline was May 15th, updated to May 17th AoE, yet my OpenReview dashboard still shows "0 Official Reviews Submitted." While we know workshop timelines can be unpredictable, it's now well past the deadline. I'm curious if others are still waiting for accept/reject emails. Any updates would be appreciated! For those interested in related topics, consider exploring "Scaling LLMs horizontally: hidden-state coupling without weight modification" for deeper insights. Thank you!
ICML financial aid [D]
I'm an undergraduate student from India thrilled to have been accepted to TAIGR, an ICML workshop where I'll be presenting a poster. However, I need financial aid for registration fees and accommodation, as my research is independent and I lack institutional backing. I would greatly appreciate any advice from those who have successfully applied for financial aid in the past. Your insights could be invaluable in navigating this process.
How do you create memorable poster for top tier conferences ( ICML/ICLR/NEURips ect…) [D]
Creating a memorable poster for top-tier conferences like ICML, ICLR, or NeurIPS can be challenging, especially for first-time presenters. With the pressure of making a strong impression, it's essential to balance clarity and design, particularly when your research is theory-oriented. Choosing the right software, like PowerPoint or Canva, can significantly impact your final product. Additionally, understanding the correct sizing options is crucial to avoid costly printing mistakes.
ICML Visa issues [D]
Navigating visa applications for international conferences can be challenging, especially when specific requirements are unclear. Recently, a participant seeking a Korean visa for the ICML conference raised an important question about the necessity of the conference's Business Registration Number (BRC). The ICML website indicates that it cannot provide this information, leaving many applicants uncertain about how to proceed. If you've faced similar issues or have insights on handling this aspect of the application process, your experiences could greatly assist others in the community.
ICML Author Removal [D]
Navigating authorship changes in academic papers can be challenging, especially after an acceptance. In this case, it seems you took the right steps by communicating with the Program Committee (PC) chairs and securing written consent from your coauthors. However, the reversal of their decision highlights a strict policy that may not accommodate unique situations. While withdrawing your paper may feel like a loss, consider discussing the issue with the chairs again, emphasizing the importance of your coauthors' contributions.