conference
conference on Beyond Market Intelligence: a running collection of 52 stories we have gathered and hand-picked because they are worth your time. Every post here touches on conference in some way — the news, the analysis, the deep dives, and the occasional surprise find. Acme AI is the next-generation, AI-powered spreadsheet platform built to replace Excel and redefine how analysts, data scientists, and enterprise teams work with data. New stories are added to this page as we find them, so check back if you want to keep up with what is happening around conference, or subscribe to the RSS feed to get them as soon as they are published. Browse the collection below, or head back to the homepage to see everything Beyond Market Intelligence is covering right now.
NeurIPS 2026 Author Notifications Close to ICLR Deadline [D]
NeurIPS 2026 author notification deadlines—September 24th—are fast approaching, coinciding closely with the ICLR submission deadline. A common concern arises: are extended Area Chair and reviewer discussion phases typical? Many authors report frustration when rebuttals go unaddressed. Given this timing, researchers are strategically evaluating ICLR submissions as a contingency. As one example, our recent article, "Mathematical Experiments Are Becoming Abundant Through Human-Machine Teaming," explores related challenges in rigorous experimentation. Good luck navigating these crucial deadlines!
AC comment and our reply disappeared on OpenReview [D]
A concerning issue has emerged on OpenReview: several users report that an AC's initial comment and the author's subsequent reply have vanished. This comment, crucial for understanding reviewer feedback and addressing concerns, summarized key questions and weaknesses. The disappearance raises questions about transparency, particularly if it obscures the rationale behind potential rejection decisions. We've encountered similar discussions around data management challenges, as explored in our article, "A Day in the Life of a Data Scientist in 2026."
For the people who got reviews back from neurips, cvpr, eccv, etc and also tested their paper through an agentic reviewer like the stanford one, how different were the reviews? [D]
For those who recently received reviews from NeurIPS, CVPR, ECCV, or similar conferences, and also utilized agentic reviewer tools like the Stanford model, a compelling question arises: how do the reviews compare? We're exploring the divergence between human and LLM assessments, seeking insights into this evolving landscape. Early indications suggest significant variations, prompting a deeper understanding of how AI-assisted review impacts the peer review process. For further context on related challenges, see our article, "My Model Was Cheating on Its Own Test."
TMLR Relevance and Prestige [D]
Acceptance to *TMLR* signifies a notable achievement in machine learning research. While *NeurIPS*, *ICLR*, and *ICML* consistently rank as the highest-tier AI conferences, *TMLR* (Transactions on Machine Learning Research) holds considerable prestige as a respected journal. It’s generally considered on par with *JMLR* (Journal of Machine Learning Research) in terms of rigor and impact. Securing publication in *TMLR* demonstrates a commitment to well-validated, theoretically sound work. For further insights into transparency in algorithmic ranking, explore our article on X’s open-sourcing of its ranking algorithm.
Rivian CEO RJ Scaringe is betting on EVs, robots, and autonomy all at once — he’ll explain why at Disrupt 2026
At TechCrunch Disrupt 2026, Rivian CEO RJ Scaringe will outline his ambitious vision for the future of mobility, integrating electric vehicles, robotics, and autonomous driving. Scaringe will share key learnings from Rivian's journey, offering valuable insights into navigating a rapidly evolving technological landscape. His address promises a forward-focused perspective on how these technologies converge to transform transportation and beyond. For a broader view of influential voices shaping the AI landscape, explore our "Top 10 AI Influencers of 2026" article.
2026 NeurIPS: Where are you going? [D]
Navigating the 2026 NeurIPS landscape presents a key decision for US-based attendees: Sydney or Atlanta? This year's conference offers compelling options, prompting many to consider logistical and professional priorities. We’ve observed considerable discussion around this choice, mirroring broader questions about the future of AI research and collaboration. For those seeking deeper understanding of underlying methodologies, our recent article, "I never understood positional encoding until I read this article," offers valuable insights. Ultimately, planning ahead ensures a productive and enriching NeurIPS experience.
CIKM '26 Notification [D]
The results are in for CIKM '26! We're pleased to announce acceptances from our submissions, with 3 out of 6 full papers and 1 out of 3 short papers moving forward. A strong showing reflecting the innovative work being done in the field. For those seeking further context on related trends, consider exploring our piece, "2026 NeurIPS: Where are you going?" – a timely look at conference planning. Congratulations to all submitters and we look forward to seeing these contributions come to life.
CIKM 2026 decisions [R]
CIKM 2026 decisions are being announced today, and the resource track outcomes have begun to roll out—did you receive positive news? We understand the anticipation and effort that goes into these submissions. This is a significant moment for the AI research community. For those interested in exploring related advancements, our recent article, "Improved compression of Bad Apple into a Neural Network," delves into innovative approaches using SIREN networks. We’ll continue to share insights and analysis as more results become available.
AACL-IJCNLP Commitment Submission Number [D]
The AACL-IJCNLP commitment window has closed, and we’re tracking submissions to understand community engagement. Our team is currently compiling the total commitment count, with submission #150 among the recent entries—several users committed near the deadline, indicating sustained interest. We appreciate the proactive participation! For related perspectives on the broader AI research landscape, explore our recent piece, "73 NeurIPS workshops, and not a single one on Causality," which examines trends in causal inference research.
ECCV workshop, camera ready instructions? [D]
Navigating workshop camera-ready submissions can be surprisingly opaque. Many organizers, like those for ECCV, lack readily available instructions, leaving authors understandably uncertain. While some workshops facilitate PDF uploads via OpenReview, crucial details regarding copyright forms and LaTeX source files remain unclear. To ensure a smooth submission process, proactively seek clarification from the workshop team. For broader context on AI-driven workflows and infrastructure supporting research, explore our recent article, "Exclusive: Mirendil inks $100M+ Google Cloud deal to scale self-improving AI."
How to file a complaint about a published CVPR paper? [R]
Concerns regarding unfulfilled data release promises in published CVPR papers are increasingly relevant. If a CVPR paper’s core contribution—a dataset—remains unavailable despite conference requirements and author commitments (such as an empty GitHub repository), a formal complaint is warranted. The process isn’t always clear, but it’s essential to ensure accountability and maintain research integrity. Explore the CVPR website and conference guidelines for specific complaint procedures; a lack of dataset availability undermines the validity of the research.
Today’s the last day to get up to $400 off your TechCrunch Disrupt 2026 ticket
Don't miss out: today marks the final day to secure up to $400 off your TechCrunch Disrupt 2026 ticket. Starting now, you can unlock an additional $100 discount on Founder, Investor, or Attendee passes, building upon our existing discounted pricing. This represents a significant opportunity to access invaluable networking and insights. For more details on maximizing your Disrupt experience, explore “Your table awaits: Exhibit at TechCrunch Disrupt 2026 to be seen by thousands.” Secure your pass now and future-proof your data strategy.
How to get the best hotel deals for TechCrunch Disrupt 2026
Securing optimal accommodations for TechCrunch Disrupt 2026 is now simpler. We’ve partnered with hotels surrounding Moscone West, October 13-15, to negotiate exclusive pricing for attendees. Discover the best available rates and streamline your travel planning—focus on innovation, not logistics. For those also looking to maximize their event investment, explore "Take an extra $100 off your TechCrunch Disrupt 2026 pass: This week only!" for a limited-time discount on your ticket.
Take an extra $100 off your TechCrunch Disrupt 2026 pass: This week only!
Secure your TechCrunch Disrupt 2026 pass this week and unlock an extra $100 off—a valuable addition to our already discounted pricing for founders, investors, and attendees. Don't miss this limited-time opportunity to join us for the premier event in the startup ecosystem. Disrupt is the place to discover the future of innovation. For insights into the evolving landscape of data platforms, explore our recent article, "Platform Engineering Maturity Emerges as a Key Differentiator for Enterprise AI Success."
Do ACs also give scores? [D]
Navigating NeurIPS submissions can be confusing, especially for first-timers. Many authors wonder if Area Chairs (ACs) provide scores during Phase 2, the author-reviewer discussion. While you've received your meta-review, the absence of direct AC comments is a common query. It’s standard for ACs to remain largely silent during this phase, focusing on guiding the discussion. For more on navigating conference commitments, see our article, "Missed EMNLP commitment deadline, what can be done?". Focus on addressing reviewer concerns and refining your paper.
No rebuttals from neurips authors [D]
Many NeurIPS authors are experiencing frustration with a lack of reviewer responses, a sentiment echoed in recent discussions. It appears the absence of author rebuttals is surprisingly common; a significant number of submissions, including borderline papers with positive Area Chair feedback, haven't received them. This leaves authors understandably perplexed. While challenging, this situation highlights a broader issue within the peer review process. For deeper insights into related concerns, explore our article, "neurips 2026: ACs and reviewers have disappeared."
Bad but typical NeurIPS experience? [D]
The NeurIPS review process, as highlighted by one researcher's experience, can be a frustrating lottery. Despite conscientious reviewing and generous scoring, unexpectedly harsh reviews and unresponsive area chairs created a deeply discouraging experience. Adversarial reviewer feedback, coupled with a late-stage AC response, underscored the system’s inherent unpredictability and potential toxicity. This highlights a broader issue within the AI research community, prompting discussions around reviewer accountability—as explored in articles like "NeurIPS 2026: If the rebuttal addresses your concern, please raise your score."
neurips 2026: ACs and reviewers have disappeared [D]
NeurIPS 2026 reviewers and Area Chairs have inexplicably vanished, leaving several submitters in a state of uncertainty. Early rebuttal submissions, made via the designated "Rebuttal" button before the official discussion period opened, appear to have triggered no notifications, a problem also experienced by reviewers. Despite attempts to utilize meta-comments, reminders, and direct PC contact, responses remain absent with only one day left in the review cycle. This situation, impacting potential oral and spotlight candidates, highlights a systemic issue.
Editing Neurips Rebuttal [D]
Regarding NeurIPS rebuttal edits, a clarification is emerging. The post-rebuttal button will transition to an “official comment” status on July 27th AoE. While we anticipate you'll retain the ability to edit your rebuttal after this change, we advise monitoring closely. For a deeper understanding of the NeurIPS meta-reviewer response process, explore our article, "How exactly does the NeurIPS meta reviewer response work?". Stay informed as these crucial deadlines approach.
Your backstage pass to TechCrunch Disrupt 2026 is waiting
Secure your backstage pass to TechCrunch Disrupt 2026 – experience the conference from a unique perspective. Volunteering offers an unparalleled behind-the-scenes look at building one of the world’s leading startup events. Discover how the magic happens, connect with industry leaders, and gain invaluable insights into the startup ecosystem. It's a transformative opportunity for anyone interested in the future of innovation. For a glimpse into how technology empowers personal growth, explore our recent article on MeBeMe’s “interrupter” app.
QCon AI New York 2026: Registration Opens for December 15-16 Production-AI Conference
Registration is now open for QCon AI New York 2026, December 15-16, at The Westin Jersey City Newport. This production-AI conference features six expert-led tracks, chaired by Eder Ignatowicz alongside Faye Zhang and Wes Reisz, offering practical insights for deploying AI solutions. Expect the first session announcements in August, with the full program revealed by November. Explore the evolving landscape of production AI—for deeper understanding, see our recent analysis on building AI-text detectors from scratch.
Anyone heading to Jeju for KDD? Let's meet up! 🙋[D]
Heading to KDD in Jeju? Let’s connect! We'd love to meet fellow attendees exploring the frontiers of AI. Specifically, we’re keen to engage with those focused on interpretability, fairness, and the editing of text-to-image models—though conversations on any topic are welcome. If you're interested in learning more about iterative RAG generation approaches, check out our recent article, "Loop Engineering for RAG Generation." We land on the 8th and invite you to reach out for coffee, discussion, or simply to share experiences.
NeurIPS 2026 reviews exact timing[D]
The anticipation surrounding NeurIPS 2026 review release dates is understandably high. Many researchers find themselves frequently checking OpenReview, as highlighted by /u/Anshuman3480. While exact timing remains unconfirmed, historical patterns suggest a phased release, typically beginning mid-November. We understand the stress of waiting; staying informed is key. For those tracking submission numbers more broadly, our recent article on "Number of Submissions @ AAAI" offers related insights into the conference timeline. We’ll update this space as official announcements become available.
Number of Submissions @ AAAI [D]
The AAAI submission window has closed, with submission number 32xxx recently logged – a reminder of the intense competition within the field. A key question remains: how can we foster greater transparency in the peer review process, particularly for withdrawn or rejected papers? Increased accountability through public reviews would benefit the entire AI research community. For those exploring submission strategies within AI alignment, our recent article, "AAAI 27 AI Alignment track [D]," offers valuable guidance.