The question lands with the weight of a calendar year already slipping by. When a researcher asks for the main conference deadlines and result dates, they are not asking for a convenience. They are asking for the scaffolding of their professional life. The answer, as it always is, is a patchwork of dates that shift annually, and that is precisely the problem. The most prestigious venues, the ones that shape careers and set research agendas, do not operate on a single predictable rhythm, and the person asking this question knows it. They are not looking for a link to a list. They are looking for permission to plan, to block out the months ahead with some confidence that their work will land in front of the right eyes.
This request exposes a quiet tension in the AI community. The field celebrates innovation and rapid iteration, yet its most important milestones are gated by submission windows that feel almost arbitrary to the uninitiated. A missed deadline does not just mean a delayed paper. It means a lost cycle, a missed opportunity to stake a claim, a year of work that may not see the light of day until the next round. For the graduate student juggling experiments and teaching, for the industry researcher balancing product deadlines with publication goals, this is not a trivial annoyance. It is a structural barrier that rewards those who can afford to track the shifting dates and punishes those who cannot.
What the original poster is really asking for is a map. They want to know when the major conferences, the ones that do not require a workshop submission to matter, will close their doors and when they will announce their decisions. They want to align their research calendar with the realities of peer review, not the other way around. And they are right to ask. The answer matters because it shapes how they allocate their most finite resource: time. A conference deadline is not a suggestion. It is a hard boundary that determines whether months of work get a fair hearing or sit in a drawer waiting for the next cycle.
So here is the practical truth. The deadlines are spread across the year, with clusters in the spring and autumn, and the result dates follow a few months later, but none of it is fixed in stone. The responsible approach is to build a calendar around the venues you care about, check the official sites for the exact dates, and then work backward from the deadlines to set your own internal milestones. Do not rely on memory. Do not trust a single source. The community is full of tools and trackers that aggregate this information, but they are only as reliable as the people who update them. The person who asked this question deserves a direct answer, and the most direct answer is this: the dates exist, they are knowable, and they are worth the effort to track. Plan accordingly, or let the calendar plan for you.