business intelligence tools

Discover how your organization can learn from every AI insight it creates

Every day, organizations accumulate valuable knowledge their AI systems fail to utilize – a corrected investigation, a root cause analysis, a predicted service degradation.

4 min readVentureBeat
Discover how your organization can learn from every AI insight it creates

The relentless pursuit of ever-larger language models and increasingly autonomous agents has dominated the AI conversation, but Splunk's recent piece, "Why agentic enterprises need to become learning systems," offers a crucial corrective. It highlights a significant bottleneck: the vast amount of organizational knowledge generated daily that remains trapped in disparate systems and individual expert minds, never feeding back to improve AI decision-making. This isn't about models reaching a theoretical limit; it's about recognizing that even the most sophisticated AI is fundamentally reliant on the unique, context-specific knowledge embedded within an organization. This is rightly framed as the next frontier for the agentic enterprise: shifting from simply *using* AI to *learning* *through* AI, a distinction with profound implications. As Sakana's recent launch of Fugu No Claude Fable 5? No problem: Sakana achieves frontier performance with new Fugu multi-model, auto synthesis system demonstrates, the orchestration and synthesis of multiple models is becoming increasingly important, and the ability to incorporate organizational learning into that orchestration has the potential to be a true differentiator.

The core argument – that organizations need to build architectures to capture, contextualize, and reuse operational experience – resonates deeply. The proposed architecture, encompassing memory, knowledge bases, a data fabric, AI observability, and a control plane, provides a robust framework for transforming tacit knowledge into actionable intelligence. It's a shift from reactive troubleshooting to proactive learning. The emphasis on AI observability isn't merely about debugging; it's about understanding *why* an agent behaved in a particular way, identifying human corrections, and extracting lessons learned. This echoes the ongoing need for greater transparency and explainability in AI systems, particularly in high-stakes environments like cybersecurity – as underscored by the recent Klue hack and subsequent data breaches at several cybersecurity firms Klue hack results in data breach at several cybersecurity firms. The ability to correlate disparate data points – latency trends, network anomalies, security events – and translate them into reusable knowledge is a game-changer.

Splunk's focus on a learning system, rather than solely on model capabilities, is a refreshing perspective. It acknowledges that the true competitive advantage won't lie in who has the biggest model, but in who can most effectively leverage their existing data and expertise to continuously improve their AI systems. The example of the intermittent service degradation, demonstrating how a learning system could prevent the recurrence of a previously encountered issue, is particularly compelling. It showcases the potential for a virtuous cycle: agents generate signals, humans provide corrections, and the system learns from those interactions, leading to progressively more effective decision-making. This proactive, learning-driven approach directly addresses the challenges of maintaining and optimizing increasingly complex AI deployments, particularly in dynamic and rapidly evolving operational environments.

Ultimately, Splunk's vision paints a picture of AI not as a standalone solution, but as an integral component of a broader, self-improving organizational ecosystem. The ability to connect operational data, observe agent behavior, preserve experience, and govern how learning changes agent behavior is the key to unlocking the full potential of the agentic enterprise. The question now becomes: how quickly can organizations build these learning architectures and integrate them into their existing workflows? The organizations that prioritize this shift, rather than solely chasing the latest model advancements, are likely to reap the most significant rewards in the coming years, creating AI systems that truly get better with age.

From VentureBeat

Every day, organizations learn things their AI systems never get to use.

A security analyst corrects an AI-generated investigation. A network engineer identifies the root cause of a recurring outage. An observability team discovers that a pattern of latency, logs and infrastructure changes predicts service degradation. A customer operations team learns which signals indicate an escalation is likely.

Read the original at VentureBeat